News about the 4th International Conference on Argumentation, Rhetoric, Debate and the Pedagogy of Empowerment, date and location coming soon!
Monday, March 24, 2008
Tentative Schedule Released for Conference
2nd International Conference on Argumentation, Rhetoric, Debate and the Pedagogy of Empowerment
YOU CAN STILL ATTEND! A FEW SLOTS FOR PRESENTATIONS ARE STILL AVAILABLE. CONTACT BOJANA SKRT AT bojana.skrt@siol.net.
11-12-13 April 2008, Ljubljana, Slovenia
THE HONORABLE PATRON OF THE CONFERENCE, THE PRESIDENT OF SLOVENIA, DANILO TURK
SCHEDULE (tentative)
(Please excuse the lack of national alphabet translations, we are working on that. It will be correct in the booklet distributed at the conference.)
Chairs are tentative.
FRIDAY, 11th April 2008
12.00 – 14.00 Registration
14.00 – 14. 30 Main Hall: Opening and welcome speeches
14.30 – 16.00 Presentations
Room 1 Argumentation
Chair: Lillian Bermejo Luque
Bilal Amjarso (Netherlands): What is persuasive about dealing with anticipated counterarguments? A pragma-dialectical study of a form of strategic manoeuvring
C. Andone (Netherlands): Manouevring strategically by retracting a standpoint in what can be reconstructed as the confrontation stage of a critical discussion
Paul van den Hoven (Netherlands): Playing with the Protagonist: Strategic manipulations with discourse voices
Room 2 Debate
Chair: Maja Nenadovi_
Anna Mojca England Kerr, Debate club of Faculty of social science, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia: A comparison between World Schools Debate Format and British Parliamentary Debate Format
Alex Just, Wadham College, Oxford University, UK: William Gladstone: A Model British Parliamentary Debater?
Kyle Rouse, undergraduate, Cornell University, USA: The international debating workshop as the ideal vehicle for the learning of World's Format Debating: Personal reflections on the 2007 International Debate Academy - Slovenia
Alfred Snider, University of Vermont, USA
GLOBAL DEBATE: THE STORY OF A DEBATE BLOG
Room 3 Debate
Chair: Rozalia Bako
Manolis Polychronides, PhD Candidate, University of Athens, Greece: Does debating, as an extracurricular activity, promote democratic values and skills? An empirical study in 14 Greek High schools.
Kate Shuster, Claremont College, USA: Not Making the Case: A Critical Examination of Research Supporting Urban Debate Leagues.
Bojan Marjanovi_, Chairman of the Executive board, Croatian debating society.Final year student of Sociology, department of Sociology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zagreb Croatia and Dea Ajdukovi_, HDD – Hrvatsko debatno dru_tvo (Croatian Debate Association), Croatia: Evaluation of Croatian debating society debate program
Room 4 – Pedagogy
Chair: Sam Greenland
Lara Godec Sozak, Slovenia: Analysis of students' oral presentations in the second year of primary education at the Faculty of Education in Ljubljana
Vida Von_ina, Slovenia: Critical literacy and motivation for responsible engagement in a community
G. Rhydian Morgan, UK: Critical Thinking Skills in the Classroom
Candace Williams, USA: Debate and Plagiarism: Do Current Debate Practices Violate School Honor Codes?
Main Hall
14.30 »Svetovci« showing the TV documentary about Slovenian highschool debate team participating at the Worlds School Debate Championship in Seoul 2007, followed by the discussion with the authors of the film and debaters.
16.00 – 16.30 Break
16.30 – 18.00 Main Hall
KEYNOTE Frans van Eemeren
18.15 Buses leave for the reception given by mayor of Ljubljana Zoran Jankovi_
19.00 Reception in the Ljubljana city hall
Saturday, 12th of April 2008
9.30 – 11. 30 Presentations
Room 1 Argumentation
Chair: Satoru Aonuma
Michael Hoppmann (Germany): On Three Kinds of Argumentative Responses
Ivan Mikirtumov (Russia): The Arguments driving to the Responsible Knowledge: Logical Representation
Lyudmila Kourchak (Belarus): Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation as a Background for Analyzing and Criticizing of a Cross-Cultural Business Communication.
Room 2 Debate
Chair: Sam Greenland
Alex Just, Program Director, QatarDebate, Qatar: QatarDebate and the future of debate education in the Arab World
Dr Ann Kirson Swersky, Founder and Chairperson, Sia’h vaSig – The Israel Debating Society, Israel: Establishing Parliamentary Debate in Modern Israel
Teodora Dubrovi_, prof. president of Croatian debate society and
Nada Kegalj, prof., member of the governing board of CDS, Croatia: Debate program in Croatia
Room 3 Debate
Chair: Steve Woods
Sam Nelson, Director of Debate, Cornell University: Teaching debate in non-traditional places to non-traditional audiences.
John Adams, Director of Colgate University Speaking Union, USA: Statis
Rhydian Morgan, UK: Zen & the Art of Debating
Donald Reape, undergraduate, Cornell University, USA: The case against American style policy debate: A personal narrative
Room 4 Pedagogy
Chair: Maja Nenadovi_
Panagiota Kotarinou, Anastasia Chrisanthaki-Apostolopoulou, Despina Koutli, Greece« Using “debate” in the teaching of Science
Ivana Mijatovi_ Serbia: Empowering active participation in teaching quality management courses
George Yeoman, UK: Creating or re-kindling a 'thirst for knowledge’ about global issues in the classroom
Daniela Kozlovi_, Slovenia: Debate and skill development in the philosophy class
Main Hall
9.30 Round table discussion: Is debate the best method for teaching rhetoric in the middle school?
Chair: Bojana Skrt, speakers Kristina Stopar, Irena Lapanje and others
Room 7 Special Event
10.30 Workshop: Alfred Snider, University of Vermont, USA: Tabulating a debate tournament using TRPC
11.30 – 12.00 Break
12.00 – 13.30 Main Hall
Keynote Kate Shuster
13.30 – 14.30 Lunch in the Faculty of Social Science cafeteria
14.30 – 16.30 Presentations
Room 1 Argumentation
Chair: Henrik Bohlin
Marcin Lewi_ski (Netherlands): The straw man fallacy in the Internet discussion forums
Peter Mesarec (Slovenia): Argumentation and logical fallacies in the Slovenian presidential election debate
Bart Garssen (Netherlands): Ad hominem attacks as derailments of critical testing
Constanza Ihnen (Netherlands): Exploiting topical potential with practical argumentation: what do arguers choose when they choose between arguments from consequences and arguments from principles or norms?
Room 2 Debate
Chair: Michael Hoppmann
Rhydian Morgan, UK: The changing nature of rhetoric - looking at the way rhetorical styles develop and alter over time
Conor Tucker, Student, Colgate University, USA: Rhetoric, Debate, and Deliberation: The Colgate Policy Institute
Ameila Kermis, undergraduate, Cornell University, USA: Ethos, Pathos, Logos in competitive debate: Can they be balanced?
Alfred Snider, University of Vermont, USA: NPPF: Combining writing with oral debate
Room 3 Debate
Chair: David Williams
Ivanka Mavrodieva, PhD, Rhetoric Department, Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia
Debates during the Presidential election campaigns in Bulgaria (from 1991 till 2005)
Boris Vezjak, Faculty of Arts, Maribor, Arguments, fallacies and media
Steven Woods, Ph.D., Department of Communication, Western Washington University: Arguments of Mass Destruction: The Nexus between Intercollegiate Debaters Catastrophic Impact Claims and Bush Administration Invasion Appeals
Rozália Klára Bakó, Sapientia University of Transylvania, Miercurea Ciuc, Romania and Gizela Horváth, Partium Christian University, Oradea, Romania: The Religious Icons‘ Scandal: Radiography of a Public Debate in Romania
Room 4 Pedagogy
Chair: Maria Wolrath Sodeberg
Andreas Felten, Germany: New Debate Formats and “Pre-Debate-Forms“ for classroom use
Sam Greenland, Australia: Teaching English through debate in Hong Kong
Albert Mrgole, Slovenia: Multi-systemic perspectives of school discourse
Mateja Glu_i_ Lenar_i_, Slovenia: Together in diversity – promoting intercultural dialogue in language classes through debate
Room 5 Pedagogy
Chair: Alex Just
Maja Bregar, Slovenia: Examples of debates with six and seven year-olds in the first grade of nine years' primary school in Slovenia
Nives Videc, Slovenia
Debate with six and seven year-olds in the first grade of nine years' primary school in Slovenia
Hedvika Dermol Hvala, Slovenia
Development of rhetorical skills in primary school pupils
Veronika Hovnik, Slovenia
Philosophy for children through debate
Main Hall
Live debate on the motion »Media are responsible for anorexia and bulemia among youth.« debaters from Debate club Middle school Rodica Dom_ale, coach Irena Lapanje.
Round table discussion: MIDDLE SCHOOL DEBATE PROGRAMME, speakers Kate Shuster, USA Teodora Dubrovi_, Croatia, chair: Bojana Skrt, Slovenia
16.30 – 17.00 Break
17:00 – 19.00 Presentations
Room 1 Argumentation
CHAIR: Michael Hoppmann
Lillian Bermejo Luque (Spain): Rhetorical argumentation vs. the rhetorical dimension of argumentation
Cristián Santibáñez Yáñez (Chile): Metaphorical design from an argumentative point of view
Roosmaryn Pilgram (Netherlands): Characterising character: Analysing appeals to ethos in a dialectical framework
Satoru Aonuma and Naoto Usui (Japan): In Defense of Argument Culture: A Rhetorical Criticism of Asiacentric Bias in Intercultural Communication
Room 2 Debate
Chair: Anja _erc
Miha Gartner, Gimnazija Celje – Center, Celje, Slovenia: Mentorship of debate club.
Helena Felc, Faculty of administration, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, under – graduate student: Promotion of a debate club - story of success or failure?
Alfred Snider, University of Vermont, USA: Middle Age Debate Transition - How One Coach Changed Horses in Mid Career
Bojana Skrt, Za in proti, zavod za kulturo dialoga, Slovenia: Debate as a subject.
Room 3 Debate
Chair: Rhydian Morgan
Javier Rodríguez Alcázar, University of Granada, Spain: Risk Assessment: the Limits of Expertise and the Role of Public Debate
Korry Harvey, Lecturer and Assistant Director of Forensic, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA USA: Beyond Competitive Decision Making: A Primer on Civil Discourse and Deliberative Dialogue Methodology
Donal Carbaugh, professor at Department of communication, University of Massachusetts, USA: Debate, Dialogue and Rhetoric as Cultural Discourse: Di-ciphering Codes for Communication Conduct
Sam Nelson, Director of Debate, Cornell University, USA: Debate - What its past and present can tell us about its future
Main Hall
17.00 Live debate: Worlds School Debate Format on the topic: »We should apologise for colonialism.«
19.15 Buses leave for the banquet
19.45 – 22.00 Banquet in Grad Kodeljevo
Sunday, 13th of April 2008
9.30 – 11.30 Presentations
Room 1 Argumentation
Chair: Bart Garssen
Henrik Bohlin (Sweden): Perspectives in critical thinking
Danilo _uster (Slovenia): Some dilemmas of informal logic
David Cratis Williams (USA): Rhetorical Approach to Problems of Education
Room 2 Debate
Chair: Rozalia Bako
Bo_ena Perko, Kri_e Primary School, Slovenia: Solving conflicts in school by means of coeval mediation
Maja Nenadovi_, Fellow of the George Bell Institute, University of Amsterdam, PhD Candidate: Giving Back the Voice
Dea Ajdukovi_, HDD – Hrvatsko debatno dru_tvo (Croatian Debate Association), Croatia: Attitude change and need for cognition in debaters and non-debaters
Karlina Ko_elj, Master of Politology American Studies, Professor of English and Slovene at Secondary School for Catering and Tourism Celje, Slovenia: I am proud to say: these are my students.
Room 3 Debate
Chair: Anja _erc
Jerneja Domajnko. Post – gradute student at ISH, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Debating and equal opportunities for everyone.
Christopher Langone, graduate student Department of Communication, Cornell University, USA: Debate and the media
Veronika Hovnik, Gimnazija Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia: Tekma
Room 4 Pedagogy
Chair: Zora Rutar
Maria Wolrath Soderberg, Sweden: Pedagogical consequences of viewing topoi as habits
Uve Poom, Estonia: Factors influencing student reflection in the experiential education context: case study of debate education
Darinka Vrabi_ and Alenka Gortan, Slovenia: Does matura exam restrict critical thinking and how debate can contribute to the quality of lessons
Alfred Snider & Bojana Skrt, USA & Slovenia: Teaching teachers to use debate in the classroom
Main Hall
9.30 Live debate: Worlds University Debate Format, the motion and the speakers TBA
10. 30 Round table discussion: challenges of running the university debate club
11.30 – 12.00 Break
12.00 – 13.30
Keynote Omar Salahuddin bin Abdullah, Malaysia
13.30 Main Hall
Closing ceremony
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
This is great info to know.
It won't work in actual fact, that's exactly what I suppose.
Post a Comment